Originally posted 17 Nov 2007. Somewhere over the course of platform and server migrations, these podcasts have gotten lost: I think they may be on one of the external drives gathering dust on a shelf in the studio. Podcasts and in-depth videos take more time and energy than you’d think, but there seems to be an expectation that they should be free, as the cultivation of some sort of “brand”. After all this time, I’m realizing that I’ve given away so much. Too much. It’s a difficult balance, because I believe in being fair, always erring on the lower side of what the market will bear for lesson and other professional fees paid by my students and clients. Even my self-published text, which is not cheap, nets me about a penny when purchased on Amazon, and less than $4 when purchased from Lulu. Some of this was done as seed effort: hoping the response would be large enough to create the demand for more of it. Most, though, was in the hopes of making what I do accessible to as many people as possible. Music in general and cello in particular is incredibly expensive. Somewhere along the way, though, I allowed the balance to tip too far; and it has not recovered yet. I paid for all of my travel to and from workshops, negating any profit I may have come away with. I accepted initial pay offers and worked in departments that were poorly run and did no recruiting to build my studio. I went deeply into debt with grad school and medical expenses trying to become a more qualified and physically functioning academic. It’s not been for nothing: I have forged relationships and had experiences I would never trade. I’ve had opportunities to step away and have not done so. But the cost has been real. In the end, instead of continuing with podcasts, I elected to do a few practice guides (which are also wildly labor intensive!) and people seem happy to pay for them. In the days before pain made my productivity so rationed, I wanted to churn one of them out a month. I have drafts of guides for Suite I, Elegie, and the WH Squire yin/yang of Tarantella and Danse Rustique. Then my version of Finale borked, and I haven’t yet found free notation software that works well. This has turned into a lament about money and being an artist, alas. It reminds me of one of the last conversations I had with Cathy. We were at lunch, laughing because the wind kept making our hair do crazy things. I asked how people do it: do you really have to teach 35 hours a week and be on faculty somewhere and gig several nights a week to make it? “Oh god no! Most everyone has a partner that makes as much or more than they do, or parents that continue to fund them in some way, or come from a family that has money already.” And the people that don’t? Yes. They have to sacrifice everything as well as get ridiculously lucky to be anything other than destitute. I left LA in search of the secret sauce; something that would lend me the credibility to be able to make the ends meet. I thought my struggles with solvency were a reflection of my worth. I figured my injuries made me lesser as a teacher, and that I would need to accept less and be grateful for whatever scraps I was thrown—and they really were scraps. 3 hours a week adjuncting here, $24 an hour for 2 hours of teaching there, $75 for 600 words and 3 interviews over there. I worked day jobs nearly the entire time, most of them between $9-12 per hour. I thought this subsistence living was a reflection of my rank. I had a brief flirtation with having enough money in the mid 2000s, when I had outside financial support from both parents and my partner. And it was then that I made the most money, as well. Because I could afford to turn down low-paying jobs. I could wait until a better offer came along. I could say no to taking on students that were not willing to pay my full rate. I could fly to a city on my own dime and then teach a week of private lessons, which led to other similar trips. I have not been able to finance another teaching tour, or book, since 2010. I’ve sold my cello twice to pay for medical expenses. I’ll never grind anyone to pay me more than what is fair, but I’m done offering my hardest work for free in the hopes that one day someone will pay for it. All it does is condition people to receive free labor—and me, to believing I am obligated to provide it. PS: That AST Journal article remains something I am so proud of. I still have a few copies if anyone would like one.

I am going to do a series of play-along podcasts, and I would love some suggestions for which pieces to play. I am going to choose a movement of a concerto, sonata, or maybe something like Sicilienne or Elegie, and play it at a slow speed for the listener to play along with. We all know how to obsess over a passage, but there is great value in “combing through” a piece at a slow pace, even if there are snarls along the way. It’s good to hear things at multiple speeds, and playing them slowly, with discipline is a great way to build muscle memory and stamina.

Any suggestions or requests?

PS: I have not yet gotten my AST journal. As soon as I have a few copies, I will happily mail them to those of you who want them.

Share This Post!

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on pinterest

17 thoughts on “new podcast thingy”

  1. Hi Emily,
    I vote for making something fast, slow (Sicilienne and Elegie are slow or mostly slow already, and you have already done a podcast on fast bits of Elegie).

    In order of preference:
    * Saint-Saens 1st mvmt (my personal glass ceiling)
    * Allegro Appassionato
    * Fast half of Beethoven g min sonata
    * 3d mvmt of Brahms e min sonata

    Reply
  2. I was gonna do Saint Saens first! Ok, that settles that for me. Get your helmet on…don’t want to hurt your head with all the shattering glass. 🙂

    Reply
  3. Don’t forget something easier for us less advanced types. Maybe the Marcello or Vivaldi Em sonatas, or even Cinquintaine, or Nina or easier to get accustomed with working to a podcast.

    Reply
  4. Well, yes. Yes I do. I am going to be at a session all day, but I intend to do a podcast tomorrow, barring any technical difficulties. There has been noisy construction the past 3 days, and I thought I would leave Duet For Cello and Jackhammer to John Cage. 🙂

    So I will start with Saint Saens, then Danse Rustique, and then Haydn. Maybe I will do the first page of each at a time. Hmmmm… we shall see. 🙂

    Reply
  5. Just found out they spelled my name as Emily Wight in AST. Fantabulous. I bring my A game, and I get Junior Varsity to handle my article. Foop.

    Reply
  6. Eh. It’s Wight in the TOC, but Wright on the article and bio, the things that people actually read.

    Nice article. Keep preaching the gospel that you don’t need to have a future as a professional performer to make playing an instrument a worthwhile endeavor. Let’s stomp out ageism in music!

    Oh, sorry. Nice article!

    Reply
  7. Speaking of podcasts, I’ve had a question for a while on the podcast of exercises, and just haven’t got around to it. For the long tone exercise where one crescendos towards the tip and decrescendos towards the frog, I suppose one changes the contact point according: Near the bridge when near the tip, further from the bridge when near the frog. In that case, one is “crooked bowing”, ie, moving the bow perpendicular to the string, yet at the same time with the bow at an angle so the contact point automatically changes. Or should one bow straight, ie, maintain the same contact point, which makes for a less than satisfactory crescendo-decrescendo, but maintains the same contact point?

    Reply
  8. Good question Terry! I think a subtly crooked bow should most likely apply, but it would be of equal benefit to try and maintain a straight bow just for the sheer discipline it takes. As an aside, my bow experience of late (excalibow) taught me just how much a good piece of equipment allows us to push the envelope of technique. With that bow, I was able to play on the side of the bow hair, at a slight angle, with very little pressure during Beethoven 5 2nd movement excerpts. The string crossings are insane, and the A string pops out many dynamic levels louder and timbres brighter….unless you are able to use unorthodox bow angles to minimize it. With my current setup, I am not as flexible. I am, in fact, going to look at bows today with this criteria in mind.

    /ramble

    Reply
  9. CelloGirl and Cello Geek: I can send you a photocopy of the article, if you email me your addresses. 🙂

    And the Arpeggione is brutal! What, you think I can actually play the cello?

    Well, I can, but let me burn through the prior pieces before I give Schubert the slow treatment. Out of curiosity, do you use the harmonic to play the G on the 2nd beat of measure 45? Changing to that fingering made that gesture a lot easier for me.

    Reply
  10. Great Article! I especially laughed when I came to the phrase “…utterly unfocused on the task, but completely obsessed with the goal”.

    In fact, great magazine, maybe I should join. I’ve been meaning to ask my teacher if she’ll let me borrow a few back issues.

    I hope to revive my blog this weekend by writing up more comments.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on my website.