R_HERO_MISTY_COPELAND_BBALL-171_a-1200x780

Image: Carlos Serrao. 

 

On a similar note to the previous post, I’m sure I’m not the only teacher who gets emails asking what people should do when they really want to play the cello but can’t afford a teacher. The Internet Cello Society is littered with these posts, and although my first inclination is to find the petitioner and smack them across the face with their own keyboard, I have to choose to believe that the question comes from a place of good intentions. Here’s what you need to know.

Why it is an insulting question to ask, especially of a community of professionals

The cello, like many wonderful and worthwhile pursuits, is very difficult to get good at. To attain even mildly crappy results, you have to work incredibly hard and spend the kind of time and money on the endeavor that makes you wonder if it’s even a legitimate goal. Playing the cello is like dancing en pointe in ballet. You can’t just buy a pair of Freeds and watch some videos of Misty Copeland- no matter how inspiring she is- and do anything except look a fool and break yourself.

The mechanics of the instrument are deceptively complicated. Natural human tendencies have to be curtailed and replaced with better instincts: hang instead of grip; breathe instead of gasp; slow instead of quick; qualitative instead of quantitative. Every self-taught student who enters my studio has a distorted pantomime of what the physicial act of playing the cello looks and feels like. A facile and sadly accurate axiom for these folks goes something like:

For every one self-taught week, six weeks of lessons are needed to unravel the habits and replace them with sustainable technique and approach. 

It’s not like the piano or guitar, which can be self-taught injury-free with some reasonable expectation of success.

It’s an insulting question because:

  • if there was a way to not bankrupt our parents on the way to becoming professionals, we would have really liked that
  • if there was a way to do it without decades spent practicing, that would have been nice
  • every professional cellist has had harrowing and difficult decisions to make in order to become successful
  • getting good enough to teach the instrument requires sacrifice and discipline
  • most professionals are humbled by the instrument and acknowledge that it is still very, very hard

So when someone rolls in and says “Yeah I love Bach but can’t afford lessons how can I self teach?” It takes some fairly profound restraint and a hefty dose of compassion not to reply:

  • yeah, and I want to be an astronaut
  • have fun sounding like a malfunctioning air compressor
  • ooh! you found the shortcut! special you!
  • do you have any idea who is reading this? how many cumulative hours of work you’re crapping on?
  • go back to Reddit and stay there
  • I hope I never see you in an alley, because I have worked my entire life at this. My body is held together by sinew, stitches, and Advil, and the cello tries to defeat me every day, but I persist, even though it would be wiser to give up this dream and enjoy the stability of nearly any other line of work. I do this because I have to, because it is in my soul, because it has inconveniently and permanently bent me into a shape they call cellist. I couldn’t stop even if I wanted to, and every day, the words of my teachers (and sometimes their teachers, too) echo in my head as I try to improve a little more, making myself a more suitable vessel for Bach, which I, too, love. You say you want to play the cello, but do you want to be a cellist? The experience of becoming one is not at all like what you have in mind. The bow takes years to feel like anything other than a clunky dead appendage, and the sound will punish and disappoint your ears. You will know the horror of a cello that costs less than $1000. You will become lightheaded when you realize a good set of strings costs a week’s pay, and that they will snap if you don’t install them just-so or betray you with false tone right out of the envelope. No refunds, of course. I’m not trying to discourage you, but rather give you some perspective so that you might have a chance to succeed. Becoming a cellist who can even attempt Bach is like anything else that requires insane physical and mental discipline. Think gymnast. Yogi. Ballet dancer. Formula 1 driver. Marksman. To even get marginally awful at these things asks so much of a person. And it asks that person to find another person to guide their progress. Casually asking a forum full of cellists how they can get to Bach without lessons is like asking an Olympic athlete how you can qualify for the games without a coach. It insults the people who have come before you, and it vastly underestimates the task.

You need a teacher. You have limited funds. I get it. Here are some ways to start the journey and not end up broke or broken.

Undergrad instruction

Most of us got our start teaching early on. I would give lessons on campus for about 1/3 of what I charge now, on a sliding scale. The best part of taking from someone at this level is that they are right in the wheelhouse of their lesson-taking experience.

Call up your local college and ask if there’s a hot shot student who is interested in teaching or put an ad on the music department’s bulletin board. Don’t ask for free lessons- but you might get a pretty big discount. 

Bartering

I would totally barter for lessons right now. Massage therapists, dance or woodworking lessons, goods or other services. If you have something to offer, there may be a teacher who will work with you. It’s not going to be the high-end name-brand university professor, but you’d be surprised how many of my colleagues have some kind of arrangement like this for their students to partially or completely fund lessons. If you are respectful, your chances of success are much better. 

Online lessons

My online lessons are certainly cheaper than in-studio, although it’s difficult as a beginner, because the quality of demonstration and correction are not as high as in-person. Also, latency in the connection makes it hard to play together. Feedback loops happen. C’est la vie. Still, it is SO MUCH better to have the input of an expert, even if for 15 minutes a week. If you go to Starbucks once or twice a week, those funds could likely buy two online lessons per month. Careful when you say you can’t afford lessons, Captain Lifestyle. 

Services like TakeLessons

I’m not affiliated with them at all, but I know there are plenty of folks charging cheap rates for in-studio and online lessons. In DC, I’ve seen rates as low as $15 for a half an hour. Again: that’s two Starbucks runs. Make coffee at home, and you can afford some cello.

Enroll at Community College

Lessons are paid by the semester, and end up being a fraction of the cost that a weekly non-enrolled student would pay. To give you a sense of typical cost, I’ve seen small-town cellists asking as low as $30 per hour and big-city newcomers charging $45. You might find lower, but higher is definitely the general trend. Now look at what the semester costs and divide that figure by 12 (or however many weeks that school has).

Start strong, then do touch ups

This is what I recommend to my own beginners on a budget. Take a month or two of weekly lessons and then taper off to one or two a month. Practice is a rhythm, and excellent practice needs to be curated by a professional. If you can establish some of the foundation over the course of an intensive period of lessons and practice, you’re much more likely to succeed than if you try to get by on a trickle of information. Start strong, then do what you can, while still practicing and referring to lesson notes every time you sit down to play. No student ever masters what the instructor writes in the first month of notes during that first month. Those pages are like a well of goodness to drink from for years.

Go to camps if you can. Many of them offer scholarships (sometimes in exchange for working at the camp) or payment plans. These immersive experiences are like rocket fuel for your progress and focus. Sign up for SCOR!– which I am absolutely affiliated with- or other adult string geek-outs. There are more of them than you think, all over the US and abroad.

 

The real cost

Here is a lowball estimate of what my parents and I spent on my cello education, from ages 8-25:

a few cellos: $50,000

lessons, private: $75,000

extracurricular orchestras: $10,000

summer programs: $20,000

undergraduate education: $25,000

competitions, airfare: $5000

cello repairs (two broken necks, cracks, seams) and equipment (stands, strings, cases etc) : $20,000

sheet music: $5000

That’s $210,000, lowballing each and every figure. Note that private lessons are the single highest expense. This is because they are the single most important factor in succeeding as an instrumentalist. I’d rather have a not-great instrument and a great teacher than a million dollar cello and just average instruction.

Hope this helps. It’s tough love. Tough, yes. But love, too.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share This Post!

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on pinterest

6 thoughts on “Dear Emily: when you can’t afford a teacher”

  1. Absolutely spot on. You put this in such insightful perspective. The cellist that first inspired me was a high school student and so wonderful. I said that her music was so lovely and she made it look so easy. It hit the nail on the head when she said, “I work very hard to make it look so easy”. I knew it was going to be a long journey and the many teachers I have had along the way have made it a joyful journey. By the way, that first cellist has been one of those teachers on my road.

    Reply
  2. “You say you want to play the cello, but do you want to be a cellist?” I loved this distinction! Being a cellist means hard work, dedication, adventure, failure, (lots of failure), triumph, ecstasy, growth, a different sense of what it means to be alive. Thank you again, Emily. And for me, every time you write, thank you.

    Reply
  3. This happens so much around creative endeavors. I’m sure as a writer you get many offers to do your thing for “exposure”, like they’re doing you a favor – like creative things are not worth money. As an amateur musician, I’ve found the word “talent” can be toxic. When people used to ask me about how I “learned to sing like that”, I used to do the bullshit “oh, my mom sang, and I grew up around music” when recently I realized, no, I practiced, I took YEARS of lessons with professional instructors who were amazing musicians as well as being great at teaching, and practiced some more. I sang in all kinds of ensembles, in genres that were not my faves and kept learning through them. And before/during that, the work that I did as a cellist (also with a cadre of dedicated professionals helping me every step of the way) developed me as a musician. This does not happen by osmosis, because the talent fairy has seen fit to sprinkle talent pixie dust on you.

    I don’t know what elaborate RPG people have going on in their heads, the one where schlepping a heavy, expensive and highly delicate instrument in their bag of holding is going to get them +13 on their Charisma stats, but I do have to feel sorry for them – I was incredibly fortunate to have grown up in an elementary school district that not only had a music program, but a library of instruments. When we moved to the mid-west, there was no such support for music, even in the highly rated school district we moved into. If you don’t have that exposure you don’t realize that being a musician is a skill like calculus or engineering that is not instinctual and requires expert instruction and tons of work.

    Reply
  4. Well, okay, self-teaching is self-defeating and ultimately even more costly, both in dollars and physical abuse. But I have to take exception to the comment that pianists can self-teach without physical consequences. Self-taught pianists tend to pull and stretch their hands to such extremes as to render themselves incapable sometimes of even holding a teacup. This false notion that instrumentalists need to suffer, a notion not limited to piano/strings, has caused much grief for two centuries. We have to learn how to use the body in the way it was designed to be used, which is possible on both piano and cello. My teacher used to say, “How can you make music if you’re suffering?” So get a teacher.

    Reply
    • Dr. Stannard! I really enjoy your take on teaching, and I think my dad has one of your technique texts on his piano at home. You are of course right about self-taught pianists by and large. I suppose the ones I was thinking of are less the folks who stretch themselves too far and more along the lines of those staggering through Faber&Faber or tinkering with some Elton John arrangements for EZ piano.
      As an aside, this was written in response to a Facebook post that you can tell got my hackles up a bit. I’m slowly combing through the site to edit and clarify previous posts written from places of negativity, hubris, and other afflictions of pride. This one is next on my list, as I feel my tone was excessively mean-spirited. Anyway, thank you for stopping by and sharing your thoughts. I appreciate it, and your contributions to the lexicon of piano technique and critical thinking.

      Reply

Leave a Comment

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on my website.